40 English reviews written for 3DJAKE ecoPLA White
365 customer reviews in all languages
5 stars | | 639 | (75%) |
---|---|---|---|
4 stars | | 112 | (13%) |
3 stars | | 33 | (3%) |
2 stars | | 25 | (2%) |
1 Stars | | 39 | (4%) |
Filter reviews:
-
-
Love it!
Rated with 5 out of 5 stars.
Very reliable!
Was this rating helpful? (0) (0)
-
Derek Owen
Rated with 5 out of 5 stars.
great filament
Was this rating helpful? (0) (0)
-
Bad tolerances and knots
Rated with 1 out of 5 stars.
Awful product. Would never buy. First 20-30m ok, after that I had two failed prints because the filament had larger parts and could not get extruded. Also twice I had to pause and remove a knot in the filament.
Was this rating helpful? (0) (0)
-
Works well enough with the Bambulab P1S after tweaks
Rated with 4 out of 5 stars.
Had to tweak some settings to get this printing well on the high-speed Bambulab P1S. Turning down the flow ratio (to prevent overextrusion) of the "generic PLA" preset helped a lot. It works, if still slightly sloppily. And with the lack of in-supply filament in Bambu's store this filament'll fill the gap nicely enough.
Was this rating helpful? (1) (0)
-
Excellent Print Quality, Strong Bed Adhesion, Moderate Diameter Precision
Rated with 5 out of 5 stars.
For the relatively low price, this is a great filament for daily use. It prints great at the specified temperatures and has a good adhesion on the PEI and also on satin rough print sheets.
There is enough pigment in this white filament, to create fully opaque parts even with thin (1mm) features.
Considering its affordable price, this filament is an excellent choice for everyday use. It prints seamlessly at the recommended temperatures, demonstrating strong adhesion on both PEI and satin-textured print surfaces.
The white filament boasts ample pigment, allowing for fully opaque parts even with slender (1mm) features.
The only area that could use improvement is the filament's extrusion precision, which would further enhance print outcomes. While the current extrusion is on par with most manufacturers, a tighter ±0.02 mm tolerance would be ideal.Was this rating helpful? (1) (0)
-
great material
Rated with 5 out of 5 stars.
Very consistent and easy to use. It is also quite strong.
Was this rating helpful? (1) (0)
-
Seems consistently good
Rated with 4 out of 5 stars.
I have been using this for a while and it always seems good.
Was this rating helpful? (2) (1)
-
Good
Rated with 5 out of 5 stars.
Good filament, easy to work with.
Was this rating helpful? (1) (0)
-
Bad bed adhesion but solution
Rated with 4 out of 5 stars.
The first layer is difficult to stick but there is a working solution (ender 3 v2): reduce the speed to 7 mm/s, temperature at 220 and bed temp at 70.
Rest of the print at 20 mm/s, 215 and 60.
Then it prints out nicely without stringing.Was this rating helpful? (8) (0)
Utterly Useless Landfill Generator
Rated with 1 out of 5 stars.
This stuff is the ideal gift for someone you hate. It is essentially unusable. After a few hundred failed prints & 3 or 4 that were usable (with a lot of sanding & postwork) I have just thrown half a spool of this in the bin. Never again.
lmao it's ur settings bro
Nope. Swap the spool for a spool of esun (which is actually CHEAPER than this junk) and everything prints perfectly. Exact same gcode.
It will not stick to the bed.
It warps. Badly.
If you do get a print to finish, the top surface is unacceptable. Spiky, jagged lumps everywhere. Even layer adhesion is terrible. The few prints that actually completed did so with big holes ripped in the sides that look like the bonnet louvres on a 1920s race car. Same gcode prints perfectly with the esun stuff.
There is no amount of settings adjustment, bed levelling or printer setup that can make this stuff work. It is quite simply a bad, bad product. Avoid it at all costs... Unless you have a smug friend who constantly waffles on about how great his printer is, then get him some of this for xmas and watch his interest in the hobby die.
Was this rating helpful? (0) (0)